This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Asus ProArt 5k is $799 and objectively a better choice overall. The Studio Display has a terrible stand, is 60hz, no DP/HDMI, no HDR, not OLED and really not that great if you know anything about displays. $1300 for this monitor is still very overpriced for what it is and there are much better options if you want to spend that much.
I am deep in the Apple ecosystem, am a professional photographer (use iPad/Mac/iPhone for work) and still know this is an overhyped monitor. It has pretty bad reviews overall as a result
It's also odd that it's a better deal to just buy an entire iMac for the 4.5k screen for $1200 instead of this MONITOR with 5k for $1300-1600. They are almost indistinguishable screens and its such a strange pricing structure on Apple's part. This should be an $800 monitor at most
I have 2 of these, both bought for this price at different points in time. Don't make the same mistake that I did with the first one: buy the VESA version!!!
I don't know why you're getting downvoted... rtings.com gave this display a 7.4/10 rating. It's good at a few things, but it's not great overall. So, just like you said, and by the way... that's also true for all of the other 5K@218 ppi monitors on the market. I can see why someone might choose this monitor, but it's not a clear winner on all fronts.
It has the best color accuracy of any 5K 218ppi monitor -- that's basically the reason you'd choose this monitor over the other 5K@218 ppi monitors. Sadly, the brightness and contrast are pretty comparable to the cheaper options from Samsung and ASUS (although the value proposition is different with those monitors so it's not fair to compare on price alone).
It really only excels at graphic design use cases; if you're editing HDR video you'd probably be better off with the ASUS PA27JCV 5K monitor. That said, the speakers are pretty terrible on the Samsung and ASUS while the speakers are great on the Apple model. So, you have to carefully choose what is important to you in a monitor. For me, the display is the most important part... I don't care about the speakers, built in camera, aluminum chassis, stand, etc. because they don't matter to me or I'm going to get a better stand alone version of that feature anyway.
It's a lot of money to spend on a display where most specs are worse than the display they have been putting in their macbook pros, ipads, and iphones for the past few years. I really want to love this display, and there are rumors of a refresh coming in the first half of 2025, so hopefully we'll at least get the same mini LED backlight technology that they're using in the macbook pros. If they do that, I'd be willing to pull the trigger on this $1300+ display. Until then, my choice would either be the ASUS or Samsung models (those two models have the same panel, but the panel is tuned a little differently, again... depending on what you want to use it for, one is going to be a better choice than the other).
Last edited by bonestamp February 4, 2025 at 09:08 AM.
Out of curiosity, what is so special about these? I see it is says 5k which is new to me. Id assume that is simply a bump up in resolution from 4k.
It is a very high quality panel with essentially the highest resolution available on the market. Ah and it has a pretty apple logo slapped on somewhere.
Out of curiosity, what is so special about these? I see it is says 5k which is new to me. Id assume that is simply a bump up in resolution from 4k.
There are 5 (soon to be 7) monitors on the market that are specifically made for Mac's 218 pixels per inch (ppi) graphics scaling. So, if you want the best possible image from a mac, where you can't see the pixels, you need a 218 ppi display. All of the displays built into macbooks and imacs are exactly 218 ppi.
LG was the first to release a stand alone 218 ppi monitor in 2019. It was very successful with mac users, and Apple released this monitor a couple years later. Now Samsung and ASUS (and soon BenQ) have 218 ppi monitors available. If you don't have a mac, don't bother with this monitor. If you do have a mac, and you want the text to be just as crisp and the color to be just as accurate as it is on the macbook pro screens, then this might be for you (especially if your profession relies on those things).
218 ppi monitors range in price from about $600 (used) up to $5000+ on the high end (Apple's 32" 6K Pro Display XDR). All of them are 27" except for Apple's 6K 32" option (you need 6K when you go to 32" to maintain 218 ppi).
Last edited by bonestamp February 4, 2025 at 09:11 AM.
There are 5 (soon to be 6) monitors on the market that are specifically made for Mac's 218 pixels per inch (ppi) graphics scaling. So, if you want the best possible image from a mac, where you can't see the pixels, you need a 218 ppi display. All of the displays built into macbooks and imacs are exactly 218 ppi.
LG was the first to release a stand alone 218 ppi monitor in 2019. It was very successful with mac users, and Apple released this monitor a couple years later. Now Samsung and ASUS (and soon BenQ) have 218 ppi monitors available. If you don't have a mac, don't bother with this monitor. If you do have a mac, and you want the text to be just as crisp and the color to be just as accurate as it is on the macbook pro screens, then this might be for you (especially if your profession relies on those things).
218 ppi monitors range in price from about $600 (used) up to $5000+ on the high end (Apple's 32" 6K Pro Display XDR). All of them are 27" except for Apple's 6K 32" option (you need 6K when you go to 32" to maintain 218 ppi).
Thanks for the informative reply. I'm definitely not in the market for one and was moreso just curious as to what was justifying the price people were paying for these. Your reply sheds light on that.
That Dell is nice, but it's not a true 5k monitor. It's got 5k wide, but 4k tall which gives it a PPI of only about 140 whereas the primary reason for a true 5k 27" monitor or 6k 32" monitor is to hit the magic PPI of 220. Apple doubles everything up and so when you use scaling and don't have a 5k monitor everything looks off just a bit. I've currently got a 4k 27" and it looks good, but text isn't super crisp and scaled to 1440 I sometimes get this moire effect which is why I'm stepping up to a ASD 5k as soon as it arrives.
You are correct and that's why I ordered both monitors. For video editing the Dell is unbeatable in my use case. The ASD is mostly utilized for photo editing as I'm able to use the monitor in portrait mode, hence the reason for the VESA version. Enjoy your new ASD!!
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank RCouchh
Quote
from YngviFreyr
:
Good price if you are thinking about picking up this monitor. Hardly get a better deal than this. It's the best in class at this price. Made for all Apple products.
Asus ProArt 5k is $799 and objectively a better choice overall. The Studio Display has a terrible stand, is 60hz, no DP/HDMI, no HDR, not OLED and really not that great if you know anything about displays. $1300 for this monitor is still very overpriced for what it is and there are much better options if you want to spend that much.
I am deep in the Apple ecosystem, am a professional photographer (use iPad/Mac/iPhone for work) and still know this is an overhyped monitor. It has pretty bad reviews overall as a result
It's also odd that it's a better deal to just buy an entire iMac for the 4.5k screen for $1200 instead of this MONITOR with 5k for $1300-1600. They are almost indistinguishable screens and its such a strange pricing structure on Apple's part. This should be an $800 monitor at most
Last edited by RCouchh February 6, 2025 at 01:45 PM.
Is this monitor only TB3? If so, that seriously sucks and limits the bandwidth to 40Gb/s max. HDMI and DP have much higher bandwidth. With a 5K resolution, the frame rate on this thing must be abysmal.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sorry that, after all our decades of experience, we cannot program a proper GUI. Please pay many times the price to make up for our incompetence.
For the longest time, the lack of laptop with touchscreen kept me from getting Apple. Now that I've learned about the stupid resolution issue. Recently, I also learned about the ewaste issue, since Apple doesn't allow unlocking of hardware without the previous owner's permission. So...
Apple: foolish, incompetent, and wasteful.
But hey, at least you get... um... a blue conversation or some such garbage.
I bought a 4k 27 monitor for Samsung for $300. 10 bit 100 srgb and all that good stuff. No way I'm paying this much for the Apple Screen. Plus, I can tilt it forward and backwards and turn it sideways.
I'm seeing tons of comments regarding its high price for screen size/resolution/refresh rates.
But I've been looking for a monitor that has good integrated sound system and found none of the monitors have it. I'm sick of heaving tons of wires and adaptors on/under/near my desk and I've been looking for solution to simplify my desk setup without affecting sound/mic performance. Currently I have 4 huge adaptors behind my monitor (each for monitor, CalDigit TS4 hub, Bose speaker, and a laptop) along with tons of wires going between computers/monitors/mic/speakers/hub/etc). I spent significant amount of time to declutter my desk but never could achieve clean look. I can't put adaptors on the ground because my desk is adjustable height, so I can't risk my desk pulling some wires off and trip some expensive devices while going between sitting and standing.
This monitor with good speaker/mic/hub will eliminate almost all of my adaptors/wires. And I'll probably sell my CalDigit hub, Bose speaker, and a monitor to recoup some of that cost.
1
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
I am deep in the Apple ecosystem, am a professional photographer (use iPad/Mac/iPhone for work) and still know this is an overhyped monitor. It has pretty bad reviews overall as a result
It's also odd that it's a better deal to just buy an entire iMac for the 4.5k screen for $1200 instead of this MONITOR with 5k for $1300-1600. They are almost indistinguishable screens and its such a strange pricing structure on Apple's part. This should be an $800 monitor at most
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
75 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It has the best color accuracy of any 5K 218ppi monitor -- that's basically the reason you'd choose this monitor over the other 5K@218 ppi monitors. Sadly, the brightness and contrast are pretty comparable to the cheaper options from Samsung and ASUS (although the value proposition is different with those monitors so it's not fair to compare on price alone).
It really only excels at graphic design use cases; if you're editing HDR video you'd probably be better off with the ASUS PA27JCV 5K monitor. That said, the speakers are pretty terrible on the Samsung and ASUS while the speakers are great on the Apple model. So, you have to carefully choose what is important to you in a monitor. For me, the display is the most important part... I don't care about the speakers, built in camera, aluminum chassis, stand, etc. because they don't matter to me or I'm going to get a better stand alone version of that feature anyway.
It's a lot of money to spend on a display where most specs are worse than the display they have been putting in their macbook pros, ipads, and iphones for the past few years. I really want to love this display, and there are rumors of a refresh coming in the first half of 2025, so hopefully we'll at least get the same mini LED backlight technology that they're using in the macbook pros. If they do that, I'd be willing to pull the trigger on this $1300+ display. Until then, my choice would either be the ASUS or Samsung models (those two models have the same panel, but the panel is tuned a little differently, again... depending on what you want to use it for, one is going to be a better choice than the other).
LG was the first to release a stand alone 218 ppi monitor in 2019. It was very successful with mac users, and Apple released this monitor a couple years later. Now Samsung and ASUS (and soon BenQ) have 218 ppi monitors available. If you don't have a mac, don't bother with this monitor. If you do have a mac, and you want the text to be just as crisp and the color to be just as accurate as it is on the macbook pro screens, then this might be for you (especially if your profession relies on those things).
218 ppi monitors range in price from about $600 (used) up to $5000+ on the high end (Apple's 32" 6K Pro Display XDR). All of them are 27" except for Apple's 6K 32" option (you need 6K when you go to 32" to maintain 218 ppi).
LG was the first to release a stand alone 218 ppi monitor in 2019. It was very successful with mac users, and Apple released this monitor a couple years later. Now Samsung and ASUS (and soon BenQ) have 218 ppi monitors available. If you don't have a mac, don't bother with this monitor. If you do have a mac, and you want the text to be just as crisp and the color to be just as accurate as it is on the macbook pro screens, then this might be for you (especially if your profession relies on those things).
218 ppi monitors range in price from about $600 (used) up to $5000+ on the high end (Apple's 32" 6K Pro Display XDR). All of them are 27" except for Apple's 6K 32" option (you need 6K when you go to 32" to maintain 218 ppi).
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank RCouchh
I am deep in the Apple ecosystem, am a professional photographer (use iPad/Mac/iPhone for work) and still know this is an overhyped monitor. It has pretty bad reviews overall as a result
It's also odd that it's a better deal to just buy an entire iMac for the 4.5k screen for $1200 instead of this MONITOR with 5k for $1300-1600. They are almost indistinguishable screens and its such a strange pricing structure on Apple's part. This should be an $800 monitor at most
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
For the longest time, the lack of laptop with touchscreen kept me from getting Apple. Now that I've learned about the stupid resolution issue. Recently, I also learned about the ewaste issue, since Apple doesn't allow unlocking of hardware without the previous owner's permission. So...
Apple: foolish, incompetent, and wasteful.
But hey, at least you get... um... a blue conversation or some such garbage.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
But I've been looking for a monitor that has good integrated sound system and found none of the monitors have it. I'm sick of heaving tons of wires and adaptors on/under/near my desk and I've been looking for solution to simplify my desk setup without affecting sound/mic performance. Currently I have 4 huge adaptors behind my monitor (each for monitor, CalDigit TS4 hub, Bose speaker, and a laptop) along with tons of wires going between computers/monitors/mic/speakers/hub/etc). I spent significant amount of time to declutter my desk but never could achieve clean look. I can't put adaptors on the ground because my desk is adjustable height, so I can't risk my desk pulling some wires off and trip some expensive devices while going between sitting and standing.
This monitor with good speaker/mic/hub will eliminate almost all of my adaptors/wires. And I'll probably sell my CalDigit hub, Bose speaker, and a monitor to recoup some of that cost.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!