This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Asus ProArt 5k is $799 and objectively a better choice overall. The Studio Display has a terrible stand, is 60hz, no DP/HDMI, no HDR, not OLED and really not that great if you know anything about displays. $1300 for this monitor is still very overpriced for what it is and there are much better options if you want to spend that much.
I am deep in the Apple ecosystem, am a professional photographer (use iPad/Mac/iPhone for work) and still know this is an overhyped monitor. It has pretty bad reviews overall as a result
It's also odd that it's a better deal to just buy an entire iMac for the 4.5k screen for $1200 instead of this MONITOR with 5k for $1300-1600. They are almost indistinguishable screens and its such a strange pricing structure on Apple's part. This should be an $800 monitor at most
I have 2 of these, both bought for this price at different points in time. Don't make the same mistake that I did with the first one: buy the VESA version!!!
I'm heavily in the apple ecosystem but their studio display is a major no-go. 60hz and limited to just one device at a time with no options for hdmi or DP are a joke for that kind of price. They get away with it bc of the premium design/material and bc it's apple and fanboys will eat it up. $1300 can get get you a top of the line 32" or ultrawide OLED with significantly better display quality with way more ports and versatility. Even if you stuck with Mac only you can't even have a Mac mini and MacBook hooked up to this at the same time. What other monitor would get away with having a single input connection?
Last edited by daviddang February 3, 2025 at 05:01 PM.
Surprising we haven't see a more mass consumer offering from Apple yet. Take the screen from the iMac and sell it for $500 for the masses. We don't all need $1300 screens with our $500 Mac Minis yet some would like to stay in the Apple Ecosystem.
If they did that, they wouldn't be able to sell this screen at this price. They don't want to cannibalize their own products. For Apple the price is a feature, not a bug.
For those commenting on price: The cheapest comparable monitor is the new ASUS 27" 5k and while it compares well, most reviewers agree the Studio display is better. Benq just announced a new offering at $1200 available for preorder and Viewsonic has one coming out as well, but no pricing yet. Samsung has an option that can be had for under 700 on sale, but it's not in the same league. There are some more 32" 6k options that have been announced, but currently the Dell at $2300 is the cheapest. If you want a high PPI monitor there are few options and the studio display is one of the best and this is a good price for the studio display.
I just purchased both a new ASD (vesa mount) and the Dell U4025QW for use with a MBP and M4 Mini pro. If I was to keep just one, I would keep the Dell. It's loaded with cool features with a huge breathtaking 5k display. It can be had for under $1500. That said, I think the Studio Display build quality is far above all others. It's a very stunning display that just pops, awesome speakers, and keyboard controlled.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I don't buy any apple products. Literally never had an apple phone. But seeing this monitor in person is a whole different level. I don't believe the specs alone do it justice.
I genuinely hope they release a pro motion version of this with a higher refresh rate. I belong to a specific group of individuals who play games on Macs!
And why would an old cpu be a problem for a monitor. Pretty sure the A13 is more powerful than most modern TVs.
If it's useless, why put it in there? Why people upgrade iPhone or Mac? 2019 CPU is a fact. I have entire Apple ecosystem in the family, I am not an apple hater, but this monitor is long in teeth.
Out of curiosity, what is so special about these? I see it is says 5k which is new to me. Id assume that is simply a bump up in resolution from 4k.
Honestly, is it worth the premium? For most people, realistically probably not. I have one and I absolutely love it. I got it for the same sale price last year. The experience of using a normal monitor and external webcam with a MacBook is just crappy enough that going all in on the Studio Display satisfied my needs. I like the built in webcam, the 5K resolution is nice, the sound is absolutely fantastic for being built in, a single thunderbolt cable connection to my MacBook Pro and I'm on the go. And most importantly: it just works… no resuming from standby issues like I've had with other displays on Mac OS. Is that by design? Who knows, maybe haha. I think even on sale it is overpriced.. but dang it, it's such a nice experience. I want ProMotion and an OLED display someday.. but shudder to think what Apple will charge for that! Anyhow, if your beholden to the forbidden fruit as I am, it's worth it. If you're the average user (or a PC user) there's absolutely no good reason to buy it.
I just purchased both a new ASD (vesa mount) and the Dell U4025QW for use with a MBP and M4 Mini pro. If I was to keep just one, I would keep the Dell. It's loaded with cool features with a huge breathtaking 5k display. It can be had for under $1500. That said, I think the Studio Display build quality is far above all others. It's a very stunning display that just pops, awesome speakers, and keyboard controlled.
That Dell is nice, but it's not a true 5k monitor. It's got 5k wide, but 4k tall which gives it a PPI of only about 140 whereas the primary reason for a true 5k 27" monitor or 6k 32" monitor is to hit the magic PPI of 220. Apple doubles everything up and so when you use scaling and don't have a 5k monitor everything looks off just a bit. I've currently got a 4k 27" and it looks good, but text isn't super crisp and scaled to 1440 I sometimes get this moire effect which is why I'm stepping up to a ASD 5k as soon as it arrives.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I genuinely hope they release a pro motion version of this with a higher refresh rate. I belong to a specific group of individuals who play games on Macs!
I'm sure there will be in time, but Thunderbolt 3 and 4 can't support enough bandwidth to get a 5k 120hz resolution. Thunderbolt 5 should, but we've only just started to get TB5 machines and monitors have not adopted the new standard just yet. So in time we can hopefully get 5-8k monitors with higher refresh rates.
Thunderbolt 4 will do 2 4k @120hz, but only 1 5k because 5k has 77% more pixels than a 4k monitor does.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
I am deep in the Apple ecosystem, am a professional photographer (use iPad/Mac/iPhone for work) and still know this is an overhyped monitor. It has pretty bad reviews overall as a result
It's also odd that it's a better deal to just buy an entire iMac for the 4.5k screen for $1200 instead of this MONITOR with 5k for $1300-1600. They are almost indistinguishable screens and its such a strange pricing structure on Apple's part. This should be an $800 monitor at most
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
75 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Thunderbolt 4 will do 2 4k @120hz, but only 1 5k because 5k has 77% more pixels than a 4k monitor does.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!